_327;SYS_HYPERTEXT;

World Family Policy Center Newsletter

* News relative to protecting the family worldwide *

                                                                                                         

Volume 4 Issue 14 - April 18, 2005

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  * * * * * * * * * * * * *  * * * * * * * *

Quote of the Day: “Strong relationships in the family are the basis

of strong relationships outside the family.”

                   —Sheikha Kouthar Cader, Capetown, South Africa

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

 

Today’s Contents:

                                                                                   

A. Featured Articles:

 

            1. A Group at Princeton Where 'No' Means 'Entirely No'

 

          2. Bringing the Case Against Judges

              Related Article: Justices to be Booted in Massachusetts?

 

3. Study: Pressure to Abort Intense for Expectant Moms Carrying Down           Syndrome Babies

 

          4. Stem-cell Vote Met with Anger

              Related Article: Harvard Stem Cell Studies Raise Eyebrows

         

          5. Would a US-style 'Megan's Law' Work in Japan?

 

          6. Oregon's High Court Negates Homosexual 'Marriage' Licenses

              Related Article: What's the Latest on State Marriage Amendments?

 

                                                                            

B. Coming Events

 

         

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

FEATURED ARTICLES

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

 

 

1. A Group at Princeton Where 'No' Means 'Entirely No'

Society members say they want a wider discussion of abstinence on a campus that expects sexual activity.

By Iver Peterson

April 18, 2005

The New York Times

         

PRINCETON, N.J.- Yet another alternate sexual lifestyle is being promoted by a group of Princeton undergraduates: one of chastity and abstinence outside of marriage.

 

Members of the Anscombe Society maintain that campus life has become so drenched in sexuality, from the flavored condoms handed out by a resident adviser to the social pressure of the hook-up scene, that Princeton needs a voice arguing for traditional sexual values. Traditional, at least, from the days before their parents went to college.

 

Their aim is not to pass moral judgment, they say, only to inform.

 

"Even though morality does factor into it, we want to enrich the discussion of sexual issues and family," said Cassandra Debenedetto, a sophomore from Stow, Mass., who was one of the founders of the group last fall. "So we also present sociological data and medical research. We want to bring all of those issues in."

 

To read entire article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/18/education/18chastity.html?oref=login

 

.................

 

2. Bringing the Case Against Judges

Are 'activist judges' ruining America? That's the fear of a newly formed coalition of religious conservatives who are urging Congress to push back.

By Jane Lampman

The Christian Science Monitor

April 13, 2005

 

WASHINGTON – 'Activist judges" are out of control and waging a war on faith, religious conservatives are charging. That's why - even as the United States Senate prepares for a battle over the president's judicial nominations - a conservative coalition is working to broaden the fight to the federal judiciary as a whole. Its ultimate goal is to force Congress to rein in the judges.

 

The Terri Schiavo case is but the latest in a litany of court decisions that have sparked conservatives' ire. Many were also outraged by rulings that called the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional and that removed the Ten Commandments and Chief Justice Roy Moore from the Alabama high court.                                           

 

"An atmosphere of atheism is being forced upon us by the courts," says the Rev. Rick Scarborough, a Baptist pastor from Texas who heads the new alliance of Evangelicals, Catholics, and Jews that is leading the charge.

 

To read entire article:

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0413/p15s02-usju.html

 

Related Article: Justices to be Booted in Massachusetts?

Panel hears bill targeting 4 who voted for same-sex marriage

April 12, 2005

WorldNetDaily.com

 

A measure to oust the four justices who voted for same-sex marriage in Massachusetts will be considered today by the state legislature's Joint Judiciary Committee.

 

Massachusetts Supreme Court Chief Justice Margaret Marshall speaking at the annual dinner of the Lesbian and Gay Bar Association in 1999 when she was an associate justice.

 

As WorldNetDaily reported, the Massachusetts-based group Article 8 Alliance is promoting a "bill of address," a Massachusetts provision allowing lawmakers to remove judges who fail to fulfill their duties.

 

The measure, filed by Democratic state Rep. Emile Goguen filed in April 2004, contends the justices violated multiple articles in the state constitution prohibiting courts from nullifying existing laws and requiring that laws remain in effect until the legislature repeals them, regardless of the actions and opinions of the judiciary branch.

 

To read entire article:

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=43745

 

..................

 

3. Study: Pressure to Abort Intense for Expectant Moms Carrying Down Syndrome Babies

By Mary Rettig and Jody Brown

April 12, 2005

 

(AgapePress) - An official of the Christian Medical & Dental Associations says a new study about abortion and Down syndrome shows a disturbing trend.

 

The study from the March issue of the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology says women often only receive negative information when a prenatal exam shows a possibility of the baby having Down syndrome. Expectant mothers, the study shows, are seldom counseled about the latest information on Down syndrome or supplied information about parent support groups during the decision-making time.

 

Dr. Gene Rudd, associate executive director of the CMDA, says he recently talked to a woman whose daughter is in a similar situation. He explains that studies have shown the baby's chromosomes to be normal, but an ultrasound has detected a birth defect.

 

"[T]his child has a club foot and one other defect, both of which are surgically correctable and compatible with a full life," Rudd says. "But this young girl is being told by her health-care providers that her best choice is to have this child aborted."

 

A 1993 Canadian study found that one-fourth of the women surveyed admitted feeling pressured to undergo an amniocentesis -- and that one-third of those who tested positive for some form of birth defect felt pressured by medical staff to have an abortion. Another study conducted three years earlier revealed this astonishing finding: 88 percent of 22,000 women whose unborn child had been diagnosed with Down syndrome chose to abort the child.

 

To read entire article:

http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/4/122005a.asp

.....................

 

4. Stem-cell Vote Met with Anger

By Amy Fagan

The Washington Times

April 12, 2005

 

House conservatives, upset that Republican leaders have agreed to a vote on expanding President Bush's embryonic stem-cell research policy, are deciding how they will fight back.

   

"The pro-life, pro-family base is very, very concerned about this," said Rep. Joe Pitts, Pennsylvania Republican. "Some of them are upset. ... We are actively engaged in this now and will be developing a strategy."

   

House Republican leaders have told Rep. Michael N. Castle, Delaware Republican, and other advocates that they can have a vote on legislation to expand Mr. Bush's 2001 policy that limited federal research funding to a group of embryonic stem-cell lines already available at the time.

 

To read entire article:

http://www.washtimes.com/national/20050410-115618-9387r.htm

 

Related Article: Harvard Stem Cell Studies Raise Eyebrows

FoxNews.com

April 12, 2005

 

BOSTON  — Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney (search) — a Republican and abortion opponent — is vowing to veto a bill that will give scientists more freedom to conduct embryonic stem cell research in the state.

 

The bill could be ready for him as early as this week. State lawmakers say they have enough votes to override the expected veto.

 

Under current state law, scientists interested in conducting stem cell research need the approval of the local district attorney. The bill would remove that requirement, give the state Health Department some regulatory controls and ban cloning for reproductive purposes.

 

To read entire article:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,153130,00.html

.......................

 

5. Would a US-style 'Megan's Law' Work in Japan?

By Matthew Rusling

The Christian Science Monitor

OSAKA, JAPAN – In November, when an elementary school student was kidnapped, raped, and murdered in Nara, a wave of public outrage coursed through Japan. Now, that emotion is about to take shape in a new national policy.

 

Starting June 1, Japan's National Police Agency will allow police to track child molesters after they have been released from prison.

 

Until now, Japanese police have not been informed of the release dates and addresses of sex offenders. But come June police will receive such information whenever an offender convicted of a sex crime against a child under the age of 13 is released in their communities.

 

The policy stops short of becoming Japan's version of Megan's Law, the law in the United States that makes the addresses of sex offenders available to the public. But some Japanese policymakers and law-enforcement agents are now urging that such information also be made available to the Japanese public.

 

To read entire article:

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0413/p15s01-woap.html

.....................

 

6. Oregon's High Court Negates Homosexual 'Marriage' Licenses

By Allie Martin and Jody Brown

April 14, 2005

 

(AgapePress) - Homosexual "marriage" may be on life support -- so says a Christian attorney in reaction to today's ruling by Oregon's highest court that invalidates thousands of marriage licenses handed out in one county last year.

 

Upwards of 3,000 homosexual couples who thought they were legally married were told by the Oregon Supreme Court on Thursday morning that they aren't. The high court has nullified marriage licenses that were issued to same-sex couples in Multnomah County over a six-week period beginning last April. The county had no authority to do so, said the court, explaining that while a county can question the constitutionality of law concerning marriage, the laws are a matter of statewide concern.

The court noted that the citizens of the state approved a constitutional amendment in November limiting marriage to one man and one woman -- but that even before that, state law put the same limits on marriage.

 

"Today, marriage in Oregon -- an institution once limited to opposite-sex couples only by statute -- now is so limited by the state Constitution as well," the court stated in its ruling. "We conclude that Oregon law currently places the regulation of marriage exclusively within the province of the state's legislative power." 

 

To read entire article:

http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/4/142005b.asp

 

Related Article: What's the Latest on State Marriage Amendments?

by Aaron Atwood, assistant editor

 

Here's the most recent information on efforts to protect the traditional definition of marriage—and how you can make a difference.

 

Kansas voters passed an amendment to their state constitution April 5 that defined marriage as "between one man and one woman," becoming the 18th state to pass a constitutional amendment to protect marriage.

 

Several other states, meanwhile, are poised to join their ranks.

 

"Whenever the people get a chance to vote on the definition of marriage, they have always voted to support the traditional view of marriage," said Mona Passignano, state issues analyst for Focus on the Family.

 

You can track what is happening in this crucial battle below.

 

To read entire article and the status of states on this issue:

http://www.family.org/cforum/extras/a0036194.cfm

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

COMING EVENTS   

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

 

Sixth World Family Policy Forum

July 11 - 13, 2005

Provo, Utah

Sponsored by the World Family Policy Center, Brigham Young University.  The theme for this year’s Forum is “Building on Doha: Marriage and Parenting in the Third Millennium.”  Participation and attendance at the Forum is by invitation only.  For further information,  contact Emily Parks 801-422-8549.

.

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *       

Note: The preceding article excerpts are highlights of current events and

do not necessarily represent the views of the World Family Policy Center

or Brigham Young University.

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *   

 

Newsletter created and distributed by:

World Family Policy Center

J. Reuben Clark Law School

Brigham Young University

Managing Director:      Richard Wilkins

Executive Director:     A. Scott Loveless

Newsletter Editors: Joy S. Lundberg and Gary B. Lundberg

If you have any articles, editorials, or papers you would like

circulated through the WFPC News network, you may submit them to

lundberg@lawgate.byu.edu

 

If you do not wish to receive a copy of WFPC News you may unsubscribe

by sending an email to listserv@listserv.byu.edu. The subject should be

left blank and the body should read, "unsubscribe wfpc_news".