World Family Policy Center Newsletter
* News
relative to protecting the family worldwide *
Volume 4 Issue 25 - June 28, 2005
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Quote of the Day: “The years with my children have taught me
there is no such thing as quality time; there is only
time, and if
you spend enough of it, some of it turns out to be
quality.”
—Karen Hughes
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * *
Today’s Contents:
A. Featured Articles:
1. Stem-cell science stirs debate in Muslim world, too
2.
'Make Abortion History' challenges U.N.
Related
Article: Nurse fired for refusing to give abortion pill
3. Virginity Pledgers Have Lower STD Rates and Engage
in Fewer Risky Sexual Behaviors
Related
Article: Abstinence Program Under Attack by ACLU
4. West Virginia
Supreme Court Redefines Family
Related Article: 'Mother's Day' too offensive?
5. Maryland Court
Rules Ten Commandments Display Constitutional
6. New Jewish Group
Forms to Fight Anti-Christian Bias
7. No
child custody for 'gay' dad
8. Higher, higher
education
9. ACLU
Now Defends Polygamy, Further Eroding Traditional Marriage
10.
Test reveals gender early in pregnancy
B. Coming Events
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
FEATURED ARTICLES
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
1. Stem-cell science stirs debate in
Muslim world, too
By Christl Dabu
The Christian Science Monitor
June 22, 2005
CAIRO AND TORONTO – Egypt is joining the ranks of
nations where scientists conduct stem-cell research. The private Egyptian IVF
(in vitro fertilization) Center in Cairo is preparing to start such work in
October, using stem cells from umbilical cord blood with the permission of
newborns' parents. It won't delve immediately into the controversial realm of
embryonic stem cells or therapeutic cloning - a way of deriving stem cells from
cloned embryos.
But as technology and cost barriers come down,
clinical director Gamal Serour says he'd like to eventually use surplus
"early embryos" from consenting couples who no longer need them for
in vitro fertilization.
That could spark the same kind of ethical debate in
Egypt that's now raging in the United States, and the prospect provides a
window onto the Muslim world's divided views about the issue.
To read entire article:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0622/p15s02-wogi.html
....................
2. 'Make Abortion History' challenges
U.N.
Group combats 'Make Poverty History' effort pushing
population control
June 21, 2005
WorldNetDaily.com
A British pro-life group has begun a "Make
Abortion History" to combat a "Make Poverty History" campaign
the organization says promotes abortion around the world.
"Christians are signing up and supporting the
[Make Poverty History] campaign without seeing the hidden agendas behind
it," Grace Mason of United for Life told WND, "so they are actually
supporting the killing of children in poor countries by abortion while at the
same time saying they want to help children of those same nations."
The Make Poverty History campaign hopes to push the
reform of trade policies, the lessening of debt owed by poor countries and a greater
level of aid to the developing world. It blames poverty on "man-made
factors like a glaringly unjust global trade system, a debt burden so great
that it suffocates any chance of recovery and insufficient and ineffective
aid."
One of the organization's plans is to rally in
Edinburgh, Scotland, during the meeting of the G-8 nations next month.
"Make Poverty History" is part of the effort
to implement the U.N.'s Millennium Development Goals, eight goals that
proponents hope will be met by 2015. They include promoting "gender
equality and empowerment of women" and improving "maternal
health" – encompassing veiled references to legal abortion.
To read entire article:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44891
Related Article: Nurse fired for refusing
to give abortion pill
June 25, 2005
WorldNetDaily.com
A nurse is suing a hospital that fired her after she
refused to administer the "morning after" abortion pill.
Toni Lemly says the St. Tammany Parish Hospital in
Louisiana violated the state's Employment Discrimination Law.
Lemly, represented by the non-profit Alliance Defense
Fund, says she had informed hospital supervisory staff that she objected to
administering the abortion pill because of her sincerely held religious
beliefs.
The hospital responded by firing her from her
full-time position and reducing her to part-time status, working only three
days a week. The demotion to part-time status caused a substantial reduction in
her pay as well as loss of employee benefits.
To read entire article:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44970
..................
3. Virginity Pledgers Have Lower STD Rates and Engage in Fewer
Risky Sexual Behaviors
by Robert Rector and Kirk A. Johnson, Ph.D.
Heritage Foundation, WebMemo #762
June 14, 2005
For more than a decade, organizations such as True
Love Waits have encouraged young people to abstain from sexual activity. As
part of these programs, young people are encouraged to take a verbal or written
pledge to abstain from sex until marriage.
An article by professors Peter Bearman and Hanna
Bruckner in the April 2005 issue of the Journal of Adolescent Health strongly
attacked virginity pledge programs and abstinence education in general. The
article stated that youth who took virginity pledges had the same sexually
transmitted disease (STD) rates as non-pledgers. It also strongly suggested
that virginity pledgers were more likely to engage in unhealthy anal and oral
sex. The report garnered widespread media attention across the nation. A
reexamination of the data, however, reveals that Bearman and Bruckner’s
conclusions were inaccurate. Moreover, in crucial respects they misled the
press and public.
Bearman and Bruckner tested the long-term effects of
virginity pledge programs, examining the health and risk behaviors of young
adults (with an average age 22) who had taken a virginity pledge as
adolescents. Their analysis was based on the National Longitudinal Study of
Adolescent Health (“Add Health”), a database funded by the federal government.
We used this same database to reexamine the issues they raised.
Several discrepancies were immediately apparent. For
starters, the Add Health data clearly reveal that virginity pledgers are less
likely to engage in oral or anal sex when compared to non-pledgers. In
addition, virginity pledgers who have become sexually active (engaged in vaginal,
oral, or anal sex) are still less likely to engage in oral or anal sex when
compared to sexually active non-pledgers. This lower level of risk behavior
puts virginity pledgers at lower risk for sexually transmitted diseases
relative to non-pledgers.
To read entire article:
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Welfare/wm762.cfm
Related Article: Abstinence Program Under
Attack by ACLU
by Wendy Cloyd
Focus on the Family
June 24, 2005
The federal funding of a program encouraging teens to
pledge abstinence until marriage is being challenged.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filed
suit to shut off federal support for the Silver Ring Thing (SRT), a group that
encourages students to pledge abstinence until marriage. The ACLU claims it's
unconstitutional to fund any program with a faith-based component.
The Silver Ring Thing encourages teens to wear a ring
as a physical reminder of their vow. SRT is not presented in public schools and
attendance is voluntary. The group offers a secular presentation of the
benefits of abstinence, then later offers the group a choice to break out into
two separate sessions—one that continues the secular view and one that adds a
faith-based message.
"The courts have repeatedly said that taxpayer
dollars cannot be used to promote religion," Julie Sternberg, senior staff
attorney for the ACLU said. "The 'Silver Ring Thing' blatantly violates
this principle."
Daniel Mach, a partner at Jenner & Block LLP,
which joined in the suit with the ACLU, went even further.
"It is alarming that the federal government pours
so much money into ineffective and dangerous abstinence-only-until-marriage
programs that promote religion," he said. "This misuse of public
funds not only harms young people but impermissibly constitutes
government-funded religion."
To read entire article:
http://www.family.org/cforum/feature/a0036985.cfm
.......................
4. West
Virginia Supreme Court Redefines Family
American Family
Association
Press Release: 6/21/2005
Tupelo, MS - The
court “has once again demonstrated the lethal effects of judicial activism,”
said Stephen M. Crampton, Chief Counsel for the AFA CLP.
Last Friday, June
17, 2005, the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals redefined what a parent is
by declaring a lesbian partner the “psychological parent” of her deceased lover’s
young child. In Tina B. v. Paul S., the court removed custody of the child from
his maternal grandparents and gave it to the lesbian partner, Tina B..
“This court has
once again demonstrated the lethal effects of judicial activism on the nuclear
family, which is the cornerstone of our civilization,” said Stephen M.
Crampton, Chief Counsel for the AFA Center for Law & Policy, which authored
a friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of two legislators in the case. “While
the court pretended to limit itself to interpreting the laws passed by the
legislature, in reality it made law and acted as a superlegislature,” Crampton
noted.
“West Virginia’s
creation of a new ‘right’ for a same-sex partner to obtain custody of her
deceased lover’s child without any written agreement, a Will, or any attempt at
adoption is but a stepping stone to recognition of same-sex marriage,” Crampton
warned.
To read entire
article:
http://www.afa.net/clp/ReleaseDetail.asp?id=94
Related
Article: 'Mother's Day' too offensive?
June 24, 2005
By Ron Strom
WorldNetDaily.com
A pre-school in
Maryland has lost at least one customer after a student's father working on the
school's newsletter was told he must change a "Happy Mother's Day"
greeting in the publication to "Happy Parent's Day."
David Becker of
Kensington, Md., had a 3-year-old son at the Kensington Forest Glen Children's
Center, which is overseen by the umbrella organization Montgomery Child Care
Association.
"My wife and I
have always been very involved with the school and with the teachers,"
Becker told WND.
The trouble began
when Becker, while typing the newsletter, changed a hand-written greeting from
"Happy Parent's Day!" to "Happy Mother's Day!" After
submitting the final draft, a teacher contacted Becker and said the greeting
would have to be changed back to "Happy Parent's Day!"
Becker says
originally it was one of the teachers who talked to him about the issue. When
he asked why, he says he was referred to an administrator.
Becker said he was
told: "We cannot say 'Mother's Day' because we might exclude someone. . .
.
"You are
insulting all the parents – the mothers, the fathers, the two-mother families,
the two-father families – you're insulting all of them."
The administrator
responded, according to Becker: "That's our policy."
To read entire
article:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44953
.................
5. Maryland
Court Rules Ten Commandments Display Constitutional
By Melanie Hunter
CNSNews.com
June 21, 2005
(CNSNews.com) - A
federal district court in Maryland ruled Tuesday that a Ten Commandments
display in a park in Frederick is constitutional.
The display, owned
by the Fraternal Order of Eagles, was challenged by the American Civil
Liberties Union, which ended up dropping its lawsuit, but Americans United for
the Separation of Church and State filed a suit in June 2003 challenging the
validity of the sale of the monument and the land on which it stood from the
city to the FOE.
"As there is
no evidence of religious purpose for Frederick's display, and no indication
that its secular purpose was insincere, the Court finds that Frederick had a
secular purpose in displaying the monument," the court said in its ruling.
"In light of
these historical and secular considerations, and the FOE's freedom to remove
the monument at any time, no reasonable observer would believe the continued
display on the Memorial Ground was intended to advance religion," the
court added.
To read entire
article:
http://www.cnsnews.com//ViewNation.asp?Page=\Nation\archive\200506\NAT20050621c.html
..................
6. New
Jewish Group Forms to Fight Anti-Christian Bias
by Bill Fancher and
Jenni Parker
June 22, 2005
(AgapePress) -
Attacks on Christianity have led to the formation of a group of defenders of
the faith -- that is, Jewish defenders of the Christian faith.
According to Boston
radio talk-show host, author and commentator Don Feder, the recently organized
"Jews Against Anti-Christian Defamation" (JAACD) was formed to
respond to negative criticism and attacks against Christians, and to combat
prejudice against that group in Hollywood, the news media, academia, politics
and the courts. The group primarily exists, he explains, to educate the public
about the "toxic nature of what has been called the last acceptable form
of prejudice."
Feder is president
of JAACD, which was organized, he says "because a group of Jewish
Americans -- authors, scholars, columnists, radio talk-show hosts, people in
the media and politics -- decided that it was important for Jews as Jews to
speak out against anti-Christian bias and discrimination." The Jewish
organization recognizes the value of the support the Christian community has
shown Israel throughout the years and wants to express general solidarity with
those who hold to biblical values as followers of Jesus.
At a press
conference last April, Feder noted that Christian believers in America
"are under assault because of the values they embrace; but the morality of
Christianity is also the morality of Judaism." The group's spokesman says
it is by maintaining their loyalty to the eternal values revealed at Mt. Sinai,
where Moses received the Ten Commandments, that Christians "have become
pariahs in the eyes of the establishment but heroes in our eyes."
To read entire
article:
http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/6/222005f.asp
................
7. No
child custody for 'gay' dad
Court rejects
argument based on Texas sodomy case
June 22, 2005
WorldNetDaily.com
The Maryland Court
of Appeals upheld an order that prevented a divorced man from having custody of
his child if he lived in a homosexual relationship.
Ulf Hedberg,
represented in court by the National Center for Lesbian Rights, contended that
the Supreme Court decision striking down Texas sodomy laws in 2003 invalidates
any court order or legislation that has a "moral base."
But the appeals
court rejected that argument, ruling that where minors are involved in
visitation disputes, courts may take into account the "sexual conduct of a
parent to determine whether it has an adverse impact on the child."
The dispute arose
after Hedberg left his wife, Annica Detthow, to pursue a same-sex relationship.
A court in Virginia, where the family lived, granted custody to Hedberg with
liberal visitation to Annica but specified that Hedberg no longer live with his
partner.
Hedberg did not
appeal the order, but one year later, he moved 26 miles to Maryland and asked
the state's courts to remove the cohabitation restriction.
He appealed after
the Maryland Circuit Court refused to modify the custody order.
Hedberg's attorneys
argued that the 2003 sodomy decision, Lawrence v. Texas, rendered the
cohabitation restriction unconstitutional.
But the Maryland
Special Court of Appeal court sent the case back to the trial court where
Hedberg will now bear the burden of proving there has been a change in
circumstances that makes it harmful to the child to not allow him to cohabit
with his same-sex partner during visitation.
To read entire
article:
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=44912
.........................
8. Higher,
higher education
By Naomi Schaefer
Riley
USA Today
June 22, 2005
For most high
school seniors, going to a college that bans alcohol and premarital sex, and
requires chapel once a week, seems like a raw deal. But the skills students
absorb at religious colleges might be giving them an edge in the job market.
Schools with strong
faith identities with strict behavioral codes - such as the evangelical Wheaton
College outside of Chicago, Brigham Young University and the Catholic Thomas
Aquinas College near Los Angeles - are not succeeding despite their religious
mission, but because of it. The faith of students at schools like these
provides them with an additional perspective on subjects from English
literature to environmental studies.
When asked how
teaching at a religious college differs from their experience teaching at
secular ones, dozens of professors have offered me the same answer: The
students here do the work, and they come to class. The students I have observed
and interviewed tend to approach their studies with a sense that God is calling
them to study hard, to find their vocation.
Susan Bratton, the
chair of the environmental studies department at Baylor University in Waco,
Texas, who has taught at several Christian and secular universities, puts it
bluntly, "One thing I like about schools like Baylor, and Christian
institutions generally, is that I don't have kids coming to class stoned at 11
in the morning."
To read entire
article:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/usatoday/20050622/cm_usatoday/higherhighereducation/nc:742
.....................
9.
ACLU Now Defends Polygamy, Further Eroding Traditional Marriage
By James L. Lambert
June 24, 2005
(AgapePress) - In
comments at an Ivy League school, the president of the American Civil Liberties
Union has indicated that among the "fundamental rights" of people is
the right to polygamous relationships -- and that the ACLU has defended and
will continue to defend that right.
In a
little-reported speech offered at Yale University earlier this year, ACLU
president Nadine Strossen stated that her organization has "defended the
right of individuals to engage in polygamy." Yale Daily News says Strossen
was responding to a "student's question about gay marriage, bigamy, and
polygamy." She continued, saying that her legal organization
"defend[s] the freedom of choice for mature, consenting individuals,"
making the ACLU "the guardian of liberty ... defend[ing] the fundamental
rights of all people."
The ACLU's newly
revealed defense of polygamy may weaken the pro-homosexual argument for
changing the traditional definition of marriage. Proponents of same-sex
"marriage" have long insisted that their effort to include homosexual
couples in that definition would only be that. However, conservative and
traditional marriage advocates predict "other shoes will drop" if homosexual
marriage is legalized -- perhaps including attempts to legalize polygamy and to
changed current legal definitions of child-adult relationships.
To read entire
article;
http://headlines.agapepress.org/archive/6/242005c.asp
.............
10.
Test reveals gender early in pregnancy
Ethicists fear use
in sex selection
By Carey Goldberg
Boston Globe
June 27, 2005
A new blood test
being marketed to American women offers them the chance to find out whether
they are having a boy or a girl almost as soon as they realize they are
pregnant, as early as five weeks along.
Just two or three
days after mailing the test overnight to a Lowell lab for processing, a
pregnant woman can know what color to paint the nursery -- or even decide
whether to get an abortion if she wants a child of the opposite sex, a prospect
that worries ethicists.
The $275 test works
by detecting and analyzing fetal DNA floating in the mother's blood, a method
that researchers say holds promise for serious clinical uses, from cancer
testing to prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome. . . .
But ethicists asked
about this early, commercial application of fetal DNA testing say it raises
concerns about sex selection, particularly in societies and immigrant groups
where boy babies are preferred.
''You can tiptoe
around it, but the fact is that if you're sending information about sex, then
you're in the sex-selection testing business," said bioethicist Arthur
Caplan of the University of Pennsylvania. He would not ban the test, he said,
but ''I would condemn it."
To read entire
article:
http://www.boston.com/yourlife/health/women/articles/2005/06/27/test_reveals_gender_early_in_pregnancy/
* * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
COMING
EVENTS
* * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Sixth
World Family Policy Forum
July
11 - 13, 2005
Provo,
Utah
Sponsored by the
World Family Policy Center, Brigham Young University. The theme for this year’s Forum is “Building
on Doha: Marriage and Parenting in the Third Millennium.” Participation and attendance at the Forum is
by invitation only. For further information, contact Emily Parks 801-422-8549 or e-mail
wfpf@byu.edu.
.
* * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Note: The preceding
article excerpts are highlights of current events and
do not necessarily
represent the views of the World Family Policy Center
or Brigham Young
University.
* * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Newsletter created
and distributed by:
World Family Policy
Center
J. Reuben Clark Law
School
Brigham Young
University
Managing
Director: Richard Wilkins
Executive
Director: A. Scott Loveless
Newsletter Editors:
Joy S. Lundberg and Gary B. Lundberg
If you have any
articles, editorials, or papers you would like
circulated through
the WFPC News network, you may submit them to
lundberg@lawgate.byu.edu
If you do not wish
to receive a copy of WFPC News you may unsubscribe
by sending an email
to listserv@listserv.byu.edu. The subject should be
left blank and the
body should read, "unsubscribe wfpc_news".