World Family Policy Center Newsletter

*News relative to protecting the family worldwide*

 

Volume 8 Issue 184 – April 17, 2008

 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  * * * * * * * * * * * * *  * * * * *  * * * * * * * *

Quote of the Day:     “Family quarrels have a total bitterness unmatched by others. Yet it sometimes happens that they also have a kind of tang, a pleasantness beneath the unpleasantness, based on the tacit understanding that this is not for keeps; that any limb you climb out on will still be there later for you to climb back.”

                                    ~ Mignon McLaughlin, The Neurotic's Notebook, 1960                       

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *  * * * * * * * * * * * * *  * * * * * * * * * * * * *

 

Today’s Contents:                 

 

A. Featured Scholar: Benjamin Scafidi

                                                                                               

B. Featured News Articles

1. Gay concern bans mum and dad in classroom

2. British Polls Show Conflicting Results on Hybrid Human Cloning Research

3. For senior, abortion a medium for art, political discourse

4. Renowned oncologist changes position on euthanasia after contracting cancer

5. Marital Faithfulness Linked to Church Attendance

6. Google to Help Curb Web Porn in Brazil

 

 

 

 


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

FEATURED SCHOLAR

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Benjamin Scafidi

Economics Professor, Georgia College and State University

 

Study: Cost of divorce to taxpayers high

By Cheryl Wetzstein

Washington Times
April 15, 2008

 

The breakdown of marriage in America costs at least $112 billion a year, owing to costs of health care, criminal justice, welfare programs and lost income-tax revenue, according to a study released today.

 

"This study documents for the first time that divorce and unwed childbearing — besides being bad for children — are also costing taxpayers a ton of money," says David Blankenhorn, president of the Institute for American Values (IAV), one of four sponsors of today's study.

 

Even a small improvement in marriage rates — for example, a 1 percent reduction in the rate of "fragmented families" — would save more than $1 billion, Mr. Blankenhorn says.

 

The $112 billion — which is equivalent to the state budget for New York — stems from "increased taxpayer expenditures" for anti-poverty, criminal justice and education programs, and lower levels of taxes paid by people whose "adult productivity has been negatively affected by increased childhood poverty caused by family fragmentation," says Benjamin Scafidi, an economics professor at Georgia College & State University and principal investigator of the report.

 

Every year, for instance, the nation supports single-parent families with about $28 billion in Medicaid and an additional $35 billion in other welfare programs, says the report, "The Taxpayer Costs of Divorce and Unwed Childbearing: First-Ever Estimates for the Nation and All 50 States."

 

An additional $9 billion is spent on child-welfare costs.

 

Single-parent families often struggle with joblessness and involvement in criminal activity, so $23 billion is estimated in lost tax revenues and $19 billion is estimated in maintenance of courts, police, prisons and jails.

 

The report does not call for a reduction of welfare programs or any other services to support single-parent families

Instead, it argues that divorce and unwed childbearing are grave public concerns, and the nation would be wise, economically and socially, to invest in strategies that strengthen marriages and families before they break up.

 

"These numbers represent real people and real suffering," says Randy Hicks, president of the Georgia Family Council, which co-sponsored the study with IAV, the Institute for Marriage and Public Policy (IMAPP) and Families Northwest.

 

Americans "fight problems like racism, poverty and domestic violence because we understand that the stakes are high," says Mr. Hicks. "And while we'll never eliminate divorce and unwed childbearing entirely, we can certainly be doing more to help marriages and families succeed."

 

This morning, Mr. Blankenhorn, Mr. Scafidi, Mr. Hicks, IMAPP President Maggie Gallagher and Families Northwest President Jeff Kemp will elaborate on the findings of their study at a news conference in Washington.

 

To view the above article online, please visit http://www.washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080415/NATION/967580377/1002/NATION&template=nextpage

 

To read the report by Benjamin Scafidi, as well as the press release, executive summary, etc. please visit http://www.americanvalues.org/html/coff_mediaadvisory.htm

 


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

FEATURED NEWS ARTICLES

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

1. Gay concern bans mum and dad in classroom

The Daily Telegraph (New South Wales, Australia)

April 17, 2008

 

Teachers are being urged to stop using terms such as husband and wife when addressing students or families under a major anti-homophobia push in schools.

 

The terms boyfriend, girlfriend and spouse are also on the banned list - to be replaced by the generic "partner" - in changes sought by the gay lobby aimed at reducing discrimination in classrooms.

 

Schools are coming under pressure to provide lessons for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender students and stack their libraries with books and videos covering their issues.

 

Among the demands are the outlawing of homophobic comments by teachers or students in the playground and a requirement for teachers to receive "diversity training".

 

Education Director-General Michael Coutts-Trotter emerged as a leader of the school anti-homophobia campaign, opening a Government-backed conference on sexual diversity - That's So Gay.

 

To view the entire article, visit http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,23551033-5001021,00.html

 

 

Related Article

 

Schools boss denies 'dad' and 'mum' ban

News.com.au (New South Wales, Australia)

April 17, 2008

 

SCHOOLS will not move to stop using words like mum and dad, or girlfriend and boyfriend, the New South Wales Education Department says, despite reports that public schools are under pressure to provide gay-friendly environments.

Changes to terminology, such as using the word "partner" to cover heterosexual relationships, are being sought by gay lobbyists bent on reducing discrimination in a major anti-homophobia push in the state's schools,
The Daily Telegraph reports.

But Department of Education and Training director-general Michael Coutts-Trotter says there is no move to stop using terms such as boyfriend, girlfriend, mum or dad in public school classrooms.

Media reports that there are moves to stop using these terms are "simply wrong", Mr Coutts-Trotter said today.


To view the entire article, visit http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23551136-2,00.html#

 

 

Related Article

 

Gay couples having trouble obtaining divorces

MSNBC.com

April 15, 2008

 

PROVIDENCE, Rhode Island - Gay couples had to struggle mightily to win the right to marry or form civil unions in certain states. Now, some are finding that breaking up is hard to do, too.

 

In Rhode Island, for example, the state's top court ruled in December that gays married in neighboring Massachusetts — the only state to allow the practice — cannot get divorced because state lawmakers have never defined marriage as anything but a union between a man and woman…

 

Over the past four years, Massachusetts has been the only state where gay marriage is legal, while nine other states allow gay couples to enter into civil unions or domestic partnerships that offer many of the rights and privileges of marriage. The vast majority of these unions require court action to dissolve.

 

Gay couples who still live in the state where they partnered can split up with little difficulty; the laws in those states include divorce or dissolution procedures for same-sex couples. But gay couples who have moved to another state are running into trouble.

 

To view the entire article, visit http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24132681/

 

 

 

................

2. British Polls Show Conflicting Results on Hybrid Human Cloning Research

LifeNews.com

April 13, 2008

 

London, England -- Polls of Britons show conflicting results on whether they support hybrid human cloning research that involves the infusing of animal and human DNA. A new London Times poll with suggests popular support for the cloning process but a previous survey of Scotland residents finds strong opposition.

 

The Times' poll, conducted by the Populus firm, found 50 percent of British residents okaying the research while 30 percent are opposed to it.

 

Members of the British Parliament could use the results in their bid to get the Human Fertilization and Embryology Bill approved in the House of Commons next month. The measure would provide scientists already engaged in the hybrid human cloning practice with firm legal ground for their research.

 

However, the poll also found opposition from the British public for another section of the bill that includes the removal of the requirement for a father in fertility treatment.

 

To view the entire article, visit http://www.lifenews.com/bio2407.html

 

 

Related Article

 

Hybrid Human Cloning is Scientific Manipulation of the Dignity of Man

LifeNews.com

March 29, 2008

 

Popular culture is blindly embracing science and ignoring legitimate moral concerns. Human dignity is steadily being eroded in the pursuit of the "advancement of science" and the quest for "cures." Increasingly, we are losing our common understanding of what it means to be a human being, and the idea that human beings are something "special" is rapidly becoming an antiquated notion.

Science is unquestionably a worthwhile pursuit, but many have come to view science as an end unto itself. The unbridled pursuit of science and technology is glorified, and any who suggest constraining science within limits of morality or propriety are condemned. Raising the simple question of whether something should be done is considered taboo. Radical science advocates are only interested in whether something can be done.

 

Central to the "science without limits" view is the notion that man is merely an animal, the product of random chance. God is removed from the creation equation and the notion of moral truth is abandoned. Notions of right and wrong are relegated to the spheres of theology and philosophy and do not constrain the consciences or actions of radical scientists.

 

The latest example of the results of radical science is the blending of human DNA and animal cells in Britain. There scientists extracted the DNA from a human embryonic cell and injected it into a "emptied" cow egg. This process, it is argued, produces a 99.9% human embryo from which scientists can harvest stem cells for further research and analysis.

 

To view the entire article, visit http://www.lifenews.com/bio2405.html

 

 

Related Article

 

Second Bioethics Watchdog Says New Human Cloning Technique is Hype

LifeNews.com

April 15, 2008

 

Washington, DC -- A second bioethics watchdog has told LifeNews.com that claims the new announcement of a supposedly easier method of human cloning is hogwash. Yesterday, mainstream media outlets in Britain and the U.S. trumpeted a supposedly new method of making human or animal clones.

 

The media reports claim the new technique is safer than the one used with Dolly the sheep, that resulted in hundreds of dead embryos and its euthanasia.

 

Scientists made chimeras by injecting an iPS cell into an existing mouse embryo to create a so-called "tetraploid" embryo.

 

Two one-cell mouse embryos are fused together to make a single cell and then the iPS cell is surrounded by "tetraploid" cells in a mixture that reforms an embryo structure.

 

American-based Advanced Cell Technology representative Robert Lanza responded to the new technique saying it is "unethical and unsafe" and making it appear there is a problem with research using iPS cells.

 

To view the entire article, visit http://www.lifenews.com/bio2410.html

 

 

 

................

3. For senior, abortion a medium for art, political discourse

Yale Daily News

April 17, 2008

 

Art major Aliza Shvarts ’08 wants to make a statement.

 

Beginning next Tuesday, Shvarts will be displaying her senior art project, a documentation of a nine-month process during which she artificially inseminated herself “as often as possible” while periodically taking abortifacient drugs to induce miscarriages. Her exhibition will feature video recordings of these forced miscarriages as well as preserved collections of the blood from the process.

 

The goal in creating the art exhibition, Shvarts said, was to spark conversation and debate on the relationship between art and the human body.

But her project has already provoked more than just debate, inciting, for instance, outcry at a forum for fellow senior art majors held last week. And when told about Shvarts’ project, students on both ends of the abortion debate have expressed shock — saying the project does everything from violate moral code to trivialize abortion.

 

But Shvarts insists her concept was not designed for “shock value.”

 

“I hope it inspires some sort of discourse,” Shvarts said. “Sure, some people will be upset with the message and will not agree with it, but it’s not the intention of the piece to scandalize anyone.”

 

To view the entire article, visit http://www.yaledailynews.com/articles/view/24513

 

 

Related Article

 

Call for Brazil abortion debate

BBC News

April 9, 2008

 

The newly-appointed minister of health in Brazil has called for a wide-ranging debate on the issue of abortion.

 

Under present law, abortion is only permitted when the life of the mother is at risk, or in the case of rape.

 

The minister, Jose Gomes Temporao, said in a newspaper interview he wanted to move the issue on from religious and moral contexts to a matter of health.

 

But his remarks are thought certain to prompt a firm response from the Roman Catholic Church in Brazil.

 

Mr Temporao says that around 200,000 women are treated for complications following abortions every year, the vast majority of them believed to have taken place in illegal clinics involving a high degree of risk for the women.

 

An opinion poll released at the weekend suggests 65% of Brazilians are against changing the existing law.

 

To view the entire article, visit http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6539831.stm

 

Related Article

 

Award-Winning Pro-Life Movie Bella Opens in Theaters across Canada

LifeNews.com

April 11, 2008

 

Ottawa, Canada -- The award-winning pro-life movie Bella will open in theaters across Canada today after taking home tremendous per-theater numbers in the United States. The movie stars Eduardo Verastegui and Tammy Blanchard and features a compassionate look at a crisis pregnancy.

 

The film finally heads to the great white north after it was named the people's choice at the 2006 Toronto film festival.

 

The movie features an honest look at how to deal with an unexpected pregnancy as Verastegui character Jose helps his friend Nina, played by Blanchard.

 

"I can't even take care of myself. How am I gonna take care of a kid?" Nina says as she confronts a problem young women deal with on a daily basis.

 

Directed by newcomer Alejandro Gomez Monteverde, Bella is a warm movie that is already earning strong reviews from Canadian media.

 

The Toronto Sun called it the "feel good movie of the week" and notes, "The filmmakers wanted to counter the usual negative Latino stereotype that mainstream movies often provide and show their Mexican culture in a positive light, and they succeed in that effort 100%."

 

To view the entire article, visit http://www.lifenews.com/int696.html

 

 

................

4. Renowned oncologist changes position on euthanasia after contracting cancer

Catholic News Agency

April 11, 2008

 

Madrid, Apr 11, 2008 / 03:21 pm (CNA).- The Spanish magazine Huellas has published an interview with Sylvie Menard, one of the most renowned oncologists in Europe who for many years was a supporter of euthanasia but several months ago changed her views after she was diagnosed with bone cancer.

 

Menard told the magazine that she always believed that each person should decide his own fate, but ‘when I became ill, I changed my position radically.”

 

“When you get sick, death ceases to be something virtual and becomes something that is with you every day,” she said.  “So you say to yourself: ‘I am going to do everything possible to live as long as possible.”

 

Menard, who is married and has one son, acknowledged, “Today anything that means a new chance at life is valuable to me.”

 

To view the entire article, visit http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=12314

 

 

................

5. Marital Faithfulness Linked to Church Attendance

CitizenLink

April 15, 2008

 

Attendance at religious services is tied to improved rates of fidelity in marriage, according to research from Fuller Theological Seminary.

 

Attending services perhaps means an individual is hearing religious teaching on marital fidelity and the importance of marriage, the researchers suggest. The assumption is they're more likely to practice what's been preached, Fox News reported.

 

But the researchers also figure that attendance implies a shared commitment by spouses and a strong network of social support.

 

"We think that sharing similar values, incorporating values and practice into one's marriage and family, and being part of a worshipping community all may be a part of this finding between religious attendance and infidelity," researcher David C. Atkins of Fuller told LiveScience.

  

To view the entire article, visit http://www.citizenlink.org/content/A000007132.cfm

 

 

 

................

6. Google to Help Curb Web Porn in Brazil

NewsMax

April 9, 2008

 

RIO DE JANEIRO, Brazil -- The head of Google in Brazil said Wednesday the Internet giant will take actions to stop child pornography and hate crimes on a social-networking Web site used here  but he did not offer to provide user information to officials.

 

Alexandre Hohagen's declaration to a Brazilian Senate panel marked a step forward in efforts to block offensive material from the popular Orkut Web site.

 

Last August, federal prosecutors said Google failed to comply with requests to provide information about users who allegedly spread child pornography and hate speech against black people, Jews and homosexuals on Orkut

 

Hohagen said the company will install filters to stop the spread of child pornography and retain six months of records on users who access or spread illicit material, according to a summary of his testimony presented on the Senate's Web site Wednesday. Google now keeps those records for only 30 days.

 

To view the entire article, visit http://newsmax.com/science/brazil_google/2008/04/09/86787.html

 

 

Related Article

 

Dr. Dobson Signs Letter Asking Marriott to Drop In-Room Porn

CitizenLink

April 11, 2008

 

Another letter has been sent to Marriott Hotels asking that pornography be removed from its in-room televisions. This one carries the signatures of almost 50 pro-family leaders, including Dr. James Dobson, founder and chairman of Focus on the Family.

 

“We’re asking Marriott to discontinue showing the in-room porn movies," said Don Wildmon, founder of the American Family Association. "Very simple. It’s not a big request.”

 

At least two other letters from pro-family leaders have been sent, with similar messages.

 

Wildmon said the move would cost Marriott millions of dollars in lost revenue, but the company can handle it.

 

"They’re not a company that’s hurting financially," he said.

 

Daniel Weiss, senior analyst for media & sexuality at Focus on the Family Action, said the letters keep the pressure on the hotel chain.

 

To view the entire article, visit http://www.citizenlink.org/CLNews/A000007112.cfm

 

 


* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *        

Note: The Featured Articles excerpts are highlights of current events and

do not necessarily represent the views of the World Family Policy Center

or Brigham Young University.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *   

 

Newsletter created and distributed by:

World Family Policy Center (www.worldfamilypolicy.org)

J. Reuben Clark Law School

Brigham Young University

Acting Managing Director: A. Scott Loveless

Newsletter Editor:  Elena Starovoitova

If you have any articles, editorials, or papers you would like

circulated through the WFPC News network, you may submit them to

wfpcsec@lawgate.byu.edu

 

If you do not wish to receive a copy of WFPC News you may unsubscribe

by sending an email to listserv@listserv.byu.edu. The subject should be

left blank and the body should read, "unsubscribe wfpc-news".